Musks AI Gamble, OpenAI & AMD + pros & cons of different Agents

In partnership with

AI HUSTLE | October 4 2025

The promise of AI agents—autonomous digital workers that can perform complex tasks, manage workflows, and interact with other systems—is rapidly becoming a reality. But for businesses and developers, a crucial question emerges: how do you build them? From low-code automation platforms to custom code and now, specialized "AgentKit" solutions, the options are proliferating. This week, we're cutting through the noise to compare the pros and cons of different approaches to agent building, helping you decide the best path for your next AI-powered assistant.

Find out why 100K+ engineers read The Code twice a week

Staying behind on tech trends can be a career killer.

But let’s face it, no one has hours to spare every week trying to stay updated.

That’s why over 100,000 engineers at companies like Google, Meta, and Apple read The Code twice a week.

Here’s why it works:

• No fluff, just signal – Learn the most important tech news delivered in just two short emails.

• Supercharge your skills – Get access to top research papers and resources that give you an edge in the industry.

• See the future first – Discover what’s next before it hits the mainstream, so you can lead, not follow.

Join 100,000+ engineers who read The Code to stay ahead of the curve.

The Hustle: Building Your AI Agent - Low-Code vs. Custom vs. AgentKit

The Goal: To understand the trade-offs between different methods of building AI agents – using no-code/low-code platforms (like Make.com/n8n), custom coding, or specialized agent development kits (like OpenAI's new AgentKit) – to help you choose the right approach for your project.

The Landscape of Agent Building:

1. Low-Code/No-Code Automation Platforms (Make.com, n8n): These tools excel at connecting different services and orchestrating multi-step workflows. While not strictly "agent building" platforms, they can be used to create agent-like behaviors by chaining AI API calls with actions across various apps.

2. Custom Code (e.g., Python with LangChain/CrewAI, Cursor.sh): For maximum flexibility and control, building agents from scratch with programming languages and specialized libraries remains a powerful option. IDEs like Cursor.sh enhance the coding experience with AI assistance.

3. Specialized Agent Development Platforms (OpenAI's AgentKit): This new category, exemplified by OpenAI's AgentKit, offers purpose-built tools designed to streamline the entire agent lifecycle, from visual workflow design to deployment and evaluation.

Here's a breakdown of the Pros and Cons for each approach:

1. Low-Code/No-Code Automation Platforms (Make.com, n8n)

• Pros:

  • Speed of Development: Rapidly connect APIs and build multi-step automations without writing much (or any) code.

  • Accessibility: Great for non-developers, citizen automators, and small businesses.

  • Cost-Effective (for light usage): Free tiers or lower entry costs for basic automation.

  • Vast Integrations: Pre-built connectors for thousands of apps and services.

  • Visual Workflow: Easy to understand and visualize process flows.

• Cons:

  • Limited Agentic Intelligence: You're primarily building automations that use AI, not truly autonomous, reasoning agents. The intelligence comes from the AI model API, not the platform itself.

  • Scalability Challenges (sometimes): Complex or high-volume AI tasks can hit rate limits or become costly on platform-managed infrastructure.

  • Less Customization: Limited ability to deeply customize agent behavior, internal reasoning loops, or create unique UIs beyond simple forms.

  • Debugging: Can be challenging to debug complex AI logic within a visual interface.

• Best For: Simple, task-specific agents (e.g., "Summarize emails and post to Slack," "Generate marketing copy for a new product," "Automate lead qualification based on form submissions").

2. Custom Code (Python with LangChain/CrewAI, VS Code/Cursor.sh)

• Pros:

  • Maximum Flexibility & Control: Build highly sophisticated, deeply integrated, and entirely custom agents.

  • Optimized Performance: Fine-tune every aspect for speed and resource efficiency.

  • Complex Logic: Ideal for intricate decision-making, multi-agent systems, and specialized reasoning.

  • Cost-Effective (for scale): Once developed, running agents on your own infrastructure can be cheaper than platform fees for high usage.

  • Version Control & Reusability: Leverage standard software development practices.

• Cons:

  • High Development Time & Cost: Requires skilled developers, significantly longer development cycles.

  • Maintenance Overhead: You're responsible for infrastructure, dependencies, and updates.

  • Steep Learning Curve: Requires deep knowledge of programming languages, AI libraries, and cloud deployment.

  • No Visual Workflow: Often harder to visualize complex agent interactions for non-technical stakeholders.

• Best For: Mission-critical, proprietary agents that require deep integration, complex reasoning, or unique interaction patterns (e.g., "Advanced financial analysis agent," "Personalized R&D assistant," "Dynamic sales negotiation agent").

3. Specialized Agent Development Platforms (OpenAI's AgentKit)

• Pros:

  • Purpose-Built for Agents: Designed from the ground up to handle agentic workflows, multi-agent orchestration, and tool use.

  • Visual Development (Agent Builder): Combines visual workflow design with agent-specific logic, bridging the gap between low-code and custom.

  • Built-in Evaluation & Optimization: Tools for measuring agent performance, tracing actions, automated prompt optimization, and reinforcement fine-tuning.

  • Unified Ecosystem (OpenAI): Seamless integration with OpenAI models and services (e.g., Connector Registry, ChatKit for UIs).

  • Guardrails: Open-source safety layers to prevent unintended or malicious behavior.

• Cons:

  • Vendor Lock-in: Primarily tied to the OpenAI ecosystem, limiting flexibility if you want to switch core models.

  • Newness: As a new platform, it's still evolving; community support and third-party integrations might be less mature than established tools.

  • Cost (potential): While currently included with API pricing, specialized agent features could lead to higher overall usage costs.

  • Still Requires Technical Understanding: While visual, building effective agents still requires an understanding of prompt engineering, tool design, and agentic principles.

• Best For: Developers and enterprises who want to build sophisticated, production-ready agents primarily powered by OpenAI models, requiring robust evaluation, safety, and visual workflow management. Ideal for use cases like advanced customer support, sales agents, and internal knowledge assistants.

The Hustle: Making Your Choice

The choice depends on your needs:

• Quick Automation, Low Complexity: Stick with Make.com/n8n.

• Ultimate Control, Deep Integration, Complex Reasoning: Custom code is your best bet.

• Sophisticated Agents with Strong Evaluation & OpenAI Focus: AgentKit offers a compelling middle ground, bridging ease of use with powerful agentic capabilities.

The key is to start with your agent's objective and complexity, then select the tools that empower you to build, deploy, and iterate most effectively.

Master Marketing Measurement with Incrementality

Still guessing which marketing tactics actually drive sales? This free guide shows how leading DTC brands use incrementality to cut waste and scale smarter. Learn how to measure true impact, optimize your budget, and move beyond outdated attribution. Download now and start making data-backed decisions that fuel real growth.

🚀 The AI Pulse: 3 Signals to Watch This Week

• Anthropic and IBM Forge Partnership for Enterprise AI. Anthropic and IBM have joined forces to integrate Anthropic's Claude AI models into IBM's extensive software ecosystem, beginning with its latest IDE. This collaboration aims to make Claude accessible to IBM's vast corporate client base, leveraging IBM's deep enterprise expertise to drive AI adoption. With nearly 80% of Claude's consumer use already outside the U.S., this move further solidifies Anthropic's international expansion and enterprise focus.

  • The Hustle Take: This deal signals a critical trend: AI model developers are increasingly partnering with established enterprise software providers to penetrate the corporate market. For your hustle: 1) Look for platform plays. If you're building AI applications, consider how you can integrate with major enterprise platforms (like IBM's) to reach a wider audience. 2) Specialization is key. Anthropic's focus on safety and ethics, combined with IBM's enterprise rigor, creates a powerful value proposition. Identify niches where specialized AI capabilities meet specific industry needs. This partnership is a blueprint for how AI will scale in the corporate world.

• OpenAI and AMD Strike Multibillion-Dollar AI Chip Deal. In a significant challenge to Nvidia's near-monopoly, OpenAI and AMD have formed a multibillion-dollar partnership. OpenAI has committed to purchasing 6 gigawatts of AMD's MI450 chips for its data centers. The deal includes warrants for up to 160 million AMD shares (roughly 10% of the company) at 1 cent per share, tied to deployment milestones, with the first gigawatt expected online by mid-2026. This represents AMD's largest success to date in the high-stakes AI semiconductor market.

  • The Hustle Take: This is a game-changer for the AI chip landscape, introducing serious competition to Nvidia. For your hustle: 1) Diversification of compute options is coming. More competition means potentially lower costs and more specialized hardware options for running and training AI models. Keep an eye on AMD's performance and consider how their solutions might fit your AI infrastructure needs. 2) Equity-linked deals are the new norm. The share warrants highlight how closely intertwined AI model developers and chip manufacturers are becoming. If you're a startup in either space, look for creative financing and partnership structures that align long-term incentives.

• Elon Musk's xAI Builds AI Supercomputer Empire in Memphis. Elon Musk's xAI is constructing an enormous AI supercomputing empire in Memphis, Tennessee/Mississippi, with two "Colossus" data centers planned. The first, already operational, houses over 200,000 Nvidia chips, and the second, "Colossus 2," will be even bigger, potentially housing 550,000 to a million chips. This multibillion-dollar gamble includes building a dedicated gigawatt-scale power plant, highlighting the extreme infrastructure demands of frontier AI. Musk's aggressive strategy underscores the belief that speed and scale of compute power will determine dominance in the AI arms race, despite the immense financial burn rate and local controversies over environmental impact.

  • The Hustle Take: This illustrates the unfathomable scale of investment and infrastructure required to compete at the very top tier of AI model development. For your hustle: 1) The AI infrastructure build-out is literal and physical. Access to power, water, and vast tracts of land are becoming as critical as silicon. If you're in real estate, energy, or construction, the AI boom presents massive opportunities. 2) Strategic vertical integration (or extreme capital expenditure) is vital for frontier AI. Musk's decision to build his own power plants and data centers demonstrates the necessity of controlling the entire stack when aiming for superintelligence. For most businesses, this means identifying strategic partners for your infrastructure, rather than trying to build it all yourself.